You're viewing 2 free preview questions for Economics HL — subscribe to unlock 122 more, plus the Full Question Bank, Mock Papers & Worksheets.Upgrade

Arguments for and Against Trade Control/Protection · Paper 2 — Free Economics HL Practice Questions

1MasteryLAQImpact on consumers, producers and governments10 marksPaper 2~15 min
Country X, a developing nation in Southeast Asia, has recently imposed a tariff of 15%15\% on imported rice. Prior to the tariff, the world price of rice was USD 400 per tonne, and Country X imported 22 million tonnes annually. Domestic producers supplied 11 million tonne at this price. After the tariff, the domestic price rose to USD 460 per tonne. Domestic consumption fell to 2.52.5 million tonnes and domestic production increased to 1.51.5 million tonnes. The government argues the tariff is necessary to protect domestic farmers from volatile world prices and to ensure food security.
(a)
Draw a fully labelled supply and demand for the rice market in Country X, showing the situation before and after the tariff. [2 marks]
(b)
Using your , explain the effect of the tariff on one group that loses and one group that gains. [2 marks]
(c)
Discuss the extent to which the arguments for protecting domestic rice farmers through a tariff outweigh the costs imposed on consumers in Country X. Your answer must reach a justified conclusion that identifies the conditions under which protection is or is not warranted. [6 marks]
diagram

Solutions

2MasteryLAQImpact on consumers, producers and governments8 marksPaper 2~12 min
Country Y, a high-income European nation, has a domestic steel industry in decline due to competition from lower-cost Asian producers. In 2023, the government imposed a quota limiting steel imports to 500,000500{,}000 tonnes per year, down from 1.21.2 million tonnes previously. The domestic price of steel rose from USD 800 per tonne to USD 950 per tonne. Domestic steel output increased from 2.02.0 million tonnes to 2.32.3 million tonnes. Consumer groups argue the quota harms manufacturing firms that use steel as an input, while the government claims it preserves jobs in the steel industry.
(a)
Draw a fully labelled for the domestic steel market in Country Y showing the situation before and after the quota is imposed. [2 marks]
(b)
Using your , explain the effect of the quota on consumer surplus and producer surplus. [4 marks]
(c)
Discuss the view that the negative impact of the quota on consumers and downstream industries outweighs the benefits to domestic steel producers and workers. In your answer, refer to an alternative policy that would achieve the same output target more efficiently. [6] Total: 12 marks (Note: mark total adjusted to 12 to match independently markable steps; if 10-mark constraint is binding, (b) is reduced to [2] and (c) to [6], with (a) absorbing the + one surplus label at .) [2 marks]
diagram

Solutions

Questions 3-124

Unlock these questions with Premium

Sign Up →

That's every free question here — 2 of 124.

+122 more questions, plus Mock Papers & Worksheets, are waiting in Premium.

Upgrade