You're viewing free preview questions. Upgrade to access more Economics SL questions.Upgrade

Introduction to Economics — Free Economics SL Practice Questions

1MasterySAQ-SNormative vs positive economics4 marksPaper 1~6 min
A newspaper headline reads: *"Government should subsidise electric vehicles to reduce carbon emissions by 15%15\% by 2030. Currently, electric vehicles make up 4%4\% of all car sales."*
(a)
Using a fully labelled , show the effect of a government subsidy on the market for electric vehicles. [2 marks]
(b)
Using your , distinguish between how a positive economist and a normative economist would each approach the claim that *"subsidising electric vehicles will reduce carbon emissions by 15%15\%."* [2 marks]
diagram

Solutions

2MasterySAQ-SNormative vs positive economics12 marksPaper 1~18 min
A finance minister states: *"Raising taxes on the richest 10%10\% of earners will increase government revenue by USD 8 billion. This fair because the rich should contribute more to society."*
(a)
Define the term positive statement. [1 mark]
(b)
Using a fully labelled Laffer curve , identify the condition under which the minister's claim that revenue will rise by USD 8 billion is valid. [2 marks]
(c)
Explain why the claim that the policy "is fair" is a normative statement, and analyse why no economic can resolve whether this claim is correct. [3] Total: [6 marks]
diagram

Solutions

3MasterySAQ-SThe problem of scarcity4 marksPaper 1~6 min
Kenya is a developing nation that allocates its limited resources between the production of two goods: tea (a major export crop) and solar panels (a capital good for renewable energy). Currently, Kenya produces at point X on its Production Possibility Frontier (PPF), where it makes 400,000400{,}000 tonnes of tea and 10,00010{,}000 solar panels per year. A new international climate fund offers Kenya a grant to invest exclusively in solar panel technology, causing the PPF to pivot outward along the solar panel axis only.
(a)
State what happens to the tea-axis intercept of Kenya's PPF as a result of the grant. [1 mark]
(b)
Calculate the opportunity cost of increasing solar panel production from 10,00010{,}000 to 15,00015{,}000 units after the grant, given that tea production falls from 400,000400{,}000 to 350,000350{,}000 tonnes. [1 mark]
(c)
Using the concept of the PPF, explain why the opportunity cost per solar panel is lower after the grant than before. [2 marks]
diagram

Solutions

4MasterySAQ-SThe problem of scarcity5 marksPaper 1~8 min
The island nation of Fiji has limited land, labour, and capital. It currently uses all its resources to produce two goods: tourism services and bottled water. The table below shows alternative production combinations for Fiji in 2023. Combination — Tourism (units) — Bottled water (units) A — 100 B — 80 — 40 C — 50 — 70 D — 0 — 90
(a)
State the opportunity cost to Fiji of moving from combination A to combination B. [1 mark]
(b)
Calculate the opportunity cost of increasing bottled water production from 40 units to 70 units. Show your working. [2 marks]
(c)
Explain why combination C is productively efficient while the combination of 40 units of tourism and 40 units of bottled water is not, and state one implication of this inefficiency for Fiji's economy. [2 marks]
diagram

Solutions

5MasteryLAQEconomic models and assumptions10 marksPaper 2~15 min

Data

- Marginal propensity to save (MPS) =0.20= 0.20 - Annual investment by firms =USD 80 million= \text{USD }80\text{ million}
A small island nation, Viti Levu, relies primarily on subsistence farming and fishing. The government is considering introducing a tourism tax and wishes to predict its impact on national income. Economists propose using the basic circular flow of income model, assuming the economy is closed (no international trade) and that there is no government sector. The model includes only households and firms: households provide factors of production and receive income; firms produce goods and services.
(a)
State one leakage and one injection in the two-sector circular flow of income model described above. [2 marks]
(b)
Calculate the equilibrium level of national income for Viti Levu. [2 marks]
(c)
Explain why the assumption of no government sector limits the usefulness of this model for predicting the impact of the tourism tax on national income. [2 marks]
(d)
Using the data and your knowledge of the circular flow model, evaluate whether this two-sector model is an appropriate tool for predicting the macroeconomic impact of the tourism tax on Viti Levu's national income. [4 marks]
diagram

Solutions

6MasteryLAQEconomic models and assumptions10 marksPaper 2~15 min

Data

Variable — Value Initial equilibrium price — USD 0.20 per kWh Initial equilibrium quantity — 100 million kWh per day Proposed carbon tax (on producers) — USD 0.05 per kWh Price elasticity of demand (PED) — 0.4-0.4 Price elasticity of supply (PES) — +1.2+1.2
Electricity Market and Carbon Tax Policy A government is considering introducing a carbon tax to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. An economist constructs a simplified economic model to predict the impact of the tax on the electricity market. The model operates under the following assumptions: - All electricity producers are profit-maximising firms. - Consumers have perfect information about the tax. - The market is perfectly competitive in the long run. - There are no external benefits or costs other than the pollution from electricity generation.
(a)
State what is meant by an economic model. [1 mark]
(b)
Using the data provided, calculate the new equilibrium price paid by consumers and the new equilibrium quantity traded after the carbon tax is introduced. Show all working. [3 marks]
(c)
Discuss the extent to which the assumption of perfect competition limits the usefulness of this model for predicting the real-world impact of the carbon tax on electricity markets. Refer to at least two distinct real-world market structures in your answer. [6 marks]
diagram

Solutions

7ChallengeLAQNormative vs positive economics10 marksPaper 2~15 min
A government is considering raising the legal minimum wage from USD 7.25 per hour to USD 15.00 per hour. An economist produces a report containing two statements: - Statement 1: "A minimum wage increase to USD 15.00 per hour will reduce employment among low-skilled workers by approximately 5 percent." - Statement 2: "A minimum wage increase to USD 15.00 per hour is a necessary step to ensure a fair standard of living for all workers."
(a)
Identify which statement is positive and which is normative. [1 mark]
(b)
Justify your answer to part (a) by explaining the distinguishing feature of each statement. [2 marks]
(c)
Using a labour market and the concept of price elasticity of demand for labour, explain how an economist would assess whether the predicted 5 percent fall in employment in Statement 1 is valid. [3 marks]
(d)
Evaluate the view that normative economics is less useful than positive economics for guiding government minimum wage policy. [4 marks]
diagram

Solutions

8MasteryLAQDefinition of economics10 marksPaper 2~15 min
The government of Vietnam faced a policy dilemma in 2023 due to a severe drought in the Mekong Delta region. The drought destroyed 200,000200{,}000 hectares of rice paddies and reduced aquaculture output by 30%30\%. The government must allocate its entire limited budget of 2.5 trillion Vietnamese Dong between two mutually exclusive options: - Option A: Subsidise farmers and invest in drought-resistant irrigation infrastructure. - Option B: Invest in new semiconductor manufacturing plants and worker training for the electronics sector.
(a)
State the fundamental economic problem illustrated by this policy dilemma. [1 mark]
(b)
Explain the opportunity cost to the Vietnamese government of choosing Option A. [2 marks]
(c)
Analyse how the opportunity cost of the government choosing Option B differs for rural farming communities compared to urban electronics workers. [3 marks]
(d)
Using the concept of scarcity, discuss whether the Vietnamese government should prioritise Option A or Option B. Your answer must reach a justified conclusion. [4 marks]
diagram

Solutions

9MasteryLAQThe problem of scarcity14 marksPaper 2~21 min
The island nation of Maldives has a land area of approximately 300km2300\,\text{km}^2. Its economy relies on two main activities: tourism (luxury resorts) and tuna fishing. In 2023, 80%80\% of the labour force and capital were allocated tourism, generating 90%90\% of GDP, while 20%20\% of resources were used in fishing. The President has proposed reallocating 10%10\% of resources from tourism to fishing to improve food security.
(a)
Explain why the Maldives cannot produce unlimited amounts of both tourism services and tuna fish. Refer to the types of resources in your answer. [4 marks]
(b)
Using a correctly labelled Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) , explain the opportunity cost of the President's proposed reallocation of resources. [4 marks]
(c)
Evaluate whether the President's proposed reallocation of resources is likely to benefit the Maldivian economy. [6 marks]
diagram

Solutions

10ChallengeLAQDefinition of economics10 marksPaper 2~15 min
Ethiopia's Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) cost approximately USD 5 billion. Critics argued this diverted resources from immediate food security and healthcare programmes. Meanwhile, Kenya's M-Pesa mobile payment system expanded financial inclusion across East Africa with comparatively low physical infrastructure investment.
(a)
Define the term scarcity as used in economics. [2 marks]
(b)
Draw a fully labelled production possibility curve (PPC) for a developing economy, showing one point of productive efficiency, one point of productive inefficiency, and one unattainable point. [3 marks]
(c)
Using your and the information above, explain how the concept of opportunity cost applies to Ethiopia's decision to invest in the GERD. [2 marks]
(d)
Evaluate the view that opportunity cost is the primary determinant of resource allocation in a developing economy. [3 marks]
diagram

Solutions