Three biodegradable scaffold materials (A, B, C) were tested for cartilage repair over 8 weeks. The percentage of scaffold mass lost and the mass of new tissue formed were recorded every two weeks.
Material A mass loss (%): 5, 10, 15, 20 at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8
Material A tissue mass (g): 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8
Material B mass loss (%): 20, 40, 60, 80 at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8
Material B tissue mass (g): 0.4, 0.7, 0.9, 1.0 at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8
Material C mass loss (%): 10, 20, 30, 40 at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8
Material C tissue mass (g): 0.3, 0.6, 0.8, 0.9 at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8
aDescribe the relationship between scaffold mass loss and tissue mass formed for each material over the 8-week period. [2]
bExplain why a scaffold that degrades too quickly or too slowly would be unsuitable for cartilage repair. [2]
cEvaluate which material would best support cartilage repair by Week 12, using extrapolated trends and the requirement that scaffold degradation and tissue formation must remain coordinated throughout repair. [2]