IB Diploma Programme · Chemistry Higher Level

Reactivity: What Drives Chemical Reactions?

Cover illustration for Reactivity: What Drives Chemical Reactions? (Chemistry Higher Level (HL)).
IBDP · Chemistry HL

Reactivity: What Drives Chemical Reactions?

Reactivity 1

34 min readAdvancedCore Reactivity 1 content: recurs every session as Paper 1 calculation MCQs, Paper 2 Hess's-Law and calorimetry data questions, HL entropy/Gibbs extended response, and Paper 3 practical-based calorimetry analysis.

Every reaction either dumps energy into its surroundings or drags energy out of them — this topic is about pinning that number down experimentally (calorimetry), then explaining it using bookkeeping tricks (Hess's Law, Born–Haber cycles) before HL adds the deeper question of why a reaction goes forward at all (entropy and ). Examiners are ruthless about sign conventions and state symbols here: get one arrow backwards in a cycle and a perfectly good calculation collapses at the final line.

Overview — The Shape of the Chapter

Why this chapter exists

Reactivity 1 asks one question with three layers: how much energy does a reaction release or absorb, how do we calculate that when we can't measure it directly, and (at HL) why does a reaction happen spontaneously at all. The first layer is calorimetry and sign conventions. The second is Hess's Law, bond enthalpies and Born–Haber cycles. The third is entropy and Gibbs free energy — the HL upgrade that finally explains why some endothermic reactions still happen on their own.

  • is always defined as — every sign error in this topic traces back to forgetting this order.
  • Standard conditions (100 kPa, a stated , 1 mol dm solutes) must be quoted whenever a value carries the ° symbol.
  • HL adds nothing new to how you measure — it adds entropy as the missing piece that finally predicts spontaneity properly.

The shape of the chapter

Command terms this topic loves to test

Command termWhat it demandsAOMark-earning move
DefineGive the precise textbook meaning, including every condition (e.g. '1 mole', 'standard conditions', 'excess oxygen').AO1Dropping one qualifier (e.g. forgetting 'excess oxygen' for combustion) typically costs the mark even if the general idea is right.
Determine / CalculateProduce a numerical answer with full working shown.AO2Working must be shown step by step; a bare correct final answer without units or sign can lose the answer mark on ECF-based mark schemes.
SketchDraw a reaction profile or graph with correct relative shape and labelled features, not to precise scale.AO2Axes must be labelled and relative heights of reactants/products/activated complex must be qualitatively correct.
DeduceUse given data to reach a conclusion that isn't stated outright, showing the reasoning link.AO3The reasoning step (e.g. 'more gas moles → higher entropy') must be written, not just the final sign.
SuggestPropose a plausible chemical explanation where more than one reasonable answer exists.AO3Any chemically sound explanation is accepted — vague answers like 'heat was lost' without naming a mechanism earn nothing.

Key point

— never the other way round. Almost every sign error in this entire topic, from calorimetry to Born–Haber cycles, traces back to violating this one ordering.

Overview

Reactivity: What Drives Chemical Reactions? — Lesson Notes | Chemistry Higher Level (HL)