
Statistics and Probability
AI SL — Topic 4: Statistics and Probability
This is the topic examiners lean on hardest, because it's the one place they can test whether you actually understand what a number means, not just whether you can press the right calculator button. A GDC will hand you , a -value, or a confidence interval in seconds — the marks live in knowing which tool to reach for, reading the question for the tail direction, and finishing with a sentence back in context. Four threads run through it: describing data you already have, inferring about a population you don't, modelling chance for single events, and modelling chance across a whole range of outcomes. They constantly borrow from each other, so treat this as one connected chapter, not four separate ones.
Overview — how the chapter fits together
One dataset, two very different jobs
Descriptive statistics summarises the sample sitting in front of you: mean, spread, a scatter diagram. Inferential statistics uses that same sample to make a claim about a population you'll never fully measure — a confidence interval, a hypothesis test, a chi-squared test. Probability and probability distributions sit underneath both: they're the machinery that tells you how much a sample result could plausibly wobble by chance alone, which is exactly what a -value is measuring.
- Every stats question on AI SL is really asking: what does this number tell us about the story in the question, not just 'is the arithmetic right'.
- The GDC does almost all the heavy computation — regression coefficients, , , -values, inverse normal — so time pressure comes from setting up the right calculation, not doing it by hand.
- Hypotheses, significance levels and conclusions must always reference the scenario (lifetime of bulbs, pH of lakes, rod lengths) — generic 'reject ' answers are routinely capped at partial marks.
The shape of the chapter
Command terms that decide how much working you need
| Command term | What it demands | AO | Mark-earning move |
|---|---|---|---|
| Write down / State | Give a fact directly from data, GDC or a formula — no derivation expected. | AO1 | Full marks for the bare answer, but wrong rounding or the wrong sign still costs the mark. |
| Calculate | Produce a numerical answer using a defined process. | AO2 | Method mark for correct setup even if arithmetic slips; final accuracy mark needs the right value to the stated sf/dp. |
| Show that | Justify a given answer with enough intermediate working to prove it, not just state it. | AO2/AO3 | Copying the given final value without the working line in between scores zero, even if your answer 'matches'. |
| Determine | Multi-step process to find an unknown quantity (e.g. regression coefficients, a critical value). | AO2 | Correct method with a wrong final number still earns M marks; the last A mark needs an exact match. |
| Interpret | Explain what a statistical value means inside the scenario, not just restate it. | AO3 | ', strong correlation' with no mention of the two variables in context loses the interpretation mark. |
| Comment on / Suggest | Evaluate a limitation of the model or conclusion tied to this specific data. | AO3 | A generic 'the sample might not be representative' with no link to the scenario scores 0. |
Key point
Overview