RevisionPrep
Back to all FAQs

RevisionPrep FAQ

IB Biology: Food Chains, Webs & Trophic Levels FAQ

Answered by RevisionPrep's IB Educators

Food chains, webs and trophic levels sit in Topic 4 (Ecology) of the current IB Biology guide and turn up constantly in Paper 1 and Paper 2. I've marked hundreds of scripts on this — most lost marks come from mixing up energy flow with biomass, not from the ecology itself.

Concept basics

How is food chains, webs & trophic levels tested in IB Biology?

It's examined across Paper 1 (data-based multiple choice on energy pyramids or pyramid of numbers), Paper 2 (short-answer and extended-response questions asking you to construct food webs or explain energy loss between levels), and occasionally in Paper 3 option data. According to the IB Biology guide (first exams 2025), this sits under Topic 4.2, Energy Flow.

Common command terms you'll see: 'construct' a food web from given data, 'calculate' percentage energy transfer, 'explain' why food chains rarely exceed five trophic levels. Paper 2 often pairs this with photosynthesis or respiration data, so examiners expect you to link energy flow to cellular processes, not just draw arrows.

What is the difference between a food chain and a food web?

A food chain is a single, linear sequence showing who eats whom — producer to primary consumer to secondary consumer. A food web shows the same community but with multiple interconnected chains, reflecting that most organisms eat more than one thing. Real ecosystems are always webs; chains are simplified teaching models.

Quick tip: if an exam question gives you a food web diagram and asks you to 'identify a food chain', just trace one single unbroken arrow path from producer to top consumer — don't try to include every organism.

What are trophic levels in IB Biology?

A trophic level is the position an organism occupies in a food chain, based on the number of energy transfers from the original producer. Producers occupy the first level, primary consumers the second, secondary consumers the third, and so on. Trophic level is about feeding position, not species identity.

Worked example: in the chain grass → grasshopper → frog → snake → hawk, grass is trophic level 1 (producer), the grasshopper is level 2 (primary consumer), the frog is level 3 (secondary consumer), the snake is level 4 (tertiary consumer), and the hawk is level 5 (quaternary consumer).

Energy flow & pyramids

Why is only about 10% of energy transferred between trophic levels?

Roughly 90% of energy at each trophic level is lost as heat through respiration, or used for movement, growth and reproduction that isn't passed on when the organism is eaten. Only the energy stored in biomass gets transferred upward, which is why the '10% rule' is a useful approximation, not a fixed law.

Worked example: if producers fix 20,000 kJ m⁻² yr⁻¹, primary consumers might gain around 2,000 kJ m⁻² yr⁻¹ (10%), and secondary consumers around 200 kJ m⁻² yr⁻¹. Examiners often give you real data with unequal percentages (say 8% or 15%) — always calculate from the given figures rather than assuming exactly 10%.

Why do food chains rarely have more than four or five trophic levels?

Because energy loss compounds at every transfer, so little usable energy remains by the fifth or sixth level to support a viable population size. Beyond four or five levels, there typically isn't enough biomass or energy left to sustain a stable population of top predators long-term.

This is a favourite 'explain' question on Paper 2. A strong answer names the mechanism (respiratory heat loss, undigested material, unconsumed parts) rather than just restating that 'energy decreases'.

What is the difference between a pyramid of numbers, biomass and energy?

A pyramid of numbers counts individual organisms at each level and can be inverted (one tree hosting thousands of insects). A pyramid of biomass measures dry mass at each level and is rarely inverted. A pyramid of energy shows energy flow per unit area per unit time and is never inverted, since energy always decreases up the chain.

Pyramid typeCan it invert?What it measures
NumbersYesIndividual organisms
BiomassOccasionallyDry mass (g m⁻²)
EnergyNeverkJ m⁻² yr⁻¹

Common mistake: students draw pyramids of biomass as always upright — but in some aquatic ecosystems, where fast-reproducing phytoplankton support a larger fish biomass, biomass pyramids can invert too.

Exam skills & common mistakes

How do you construct a food web from data in an IB Biology exam?

Read the feeding relationships given in the source material first, then draw one arrow per relationship pointing from the organism being eaten to the organism eating it — arrows always show energy flow direction, never 'who eats who' as an English sentence would suggest.

Steps:

  1. List every organism mentioned and note what it eats.
  2. Draw arrows from prey/producer to predator/consumer.
  3. Check every organism has at least one arrow in or out.
  4. Label producers, then number consumer levels.
  5. Cross-check against the raw data table before submitting your answer.

Examiners deduct marks for arrows drawn backwards — this is the single most common error I see in mock scripts.

What is the most common mistake students make with trophic levels?

Assuming an organism always sits at one fixed trophic level, when in reality omnivores and organisms with varied diets can occupy different levels depending on which food source you're tracing. A fox eating berries sits at level 2; the same fox eating a rabbit sits at level 3.

Common mistake: writing 'the fox is a secondary consumer' as a blanket fact. Examiners want you to state the trophic level relative to the specific chain given in the question.

Do I need to know the 10% rule calculation for exams?

Yes — you need to calculate percentage energy transfer between trophic levels using the formula (energy at level 2 ÷ energy at level 1) × 100, and be ready to explain the biological reasons behind the value you calculate. This appears regularly in Paper 1 data questions and Paper 2 calculations.

Worked example: if a producer level holds 5,000 kJ m⁻² yr⁻¹ and the primary consumer level holds 450 kJ m⁻² yr⁻¹, the transfer efficiency is (450 ÷ 5000) × 100 = 9%. Always show this division clearly — Paper 2 mark schemes award a method mark even if your final rounding is slightly off.

SL vs HL & syllabus placement

Is this topic examined differently at SL and HL?

The core content on food chains, webs, trophic levels and energy flow is identical for SL and HL students — it sits in Topic 4.2 of the current guide. HL students face additional ecology depth elsewhere in Topic 4 (like nutrient cycling detail), but the trophic-level content itself isn't harder at HL.

AspectSLHL
Core trophic level contentSameSame
Extra ecology depthLessNutrient cycles, succession
Paper 3 option overlapPossiblePossible

How does this topic connect to other parts of the IB Biology syllabus?

Energy flow links directly to photosynthesis (Topic 2.9) and cellular respiration (Topic 2.8), since producers fix the energy that later flows through the food web. It also connects to nutrient cycling and climate change topics later in Topic 4, so examiners love cross-topic questions here.

If a question mixes photosynthesis rate data with a food chain, expect it to ask how a change in producer productivity affects the biomass available at higher trophic levels — a genuinely popular Paper 2 question style in recent exam sessions.

Parent & study-planning questions

Why is my child struggling with this topic in IB Biology?

Most students don't struggle with the ecology itself — they struggle with the maths (percentage energy transfer calculations) and with mixing up biomass versus energy in pyramid diagrams. If your child can define trophic level but can't calculate transfer efficiency from real data, that's the gap to target first.

Ask your child to talk through one worked calculation out loud. If they can explain why the answer isn't exactly 10%, they've understood the concept properly rather than just memorised the rule.

What resources help students revise food chains and trophic levels for IB Biology?

Topical practice with real past-paper-style data questions works better than re-reading notes for this topic, since most marks are lost on calculation and diagram-construction skills rather than definitions. On RevisionPrep, students can work through topical worksheets and mock paper questions specifically on Ecology to build this exam technique.

Look for a resource that mixes short-answer definition questions with longer data-response questions — Topic 4 ecology tends to reward students who've practised reading unfamiliar data tables under time pressure, not just memorising vocabulary.

Pyramid of Numbers vs Biomass vs Energy

Pyramid typeCan it invert?What it measures
NumbersYesIndividual organisms
BiomassOccasionallyDry mass (g m⁻²)
EnergyNeverkJ m⁻² yr⁻¹

For topical worksheets, revision notes and mock paper questions on IB Biology Ecology, including food chains, webs and trophic levels, explore the DP Biology resources on RevisionPrep.

Related reading