RevisionPrep FAQ
IB Chemistry Electrophilic Addition Reactions: The Complete FAQ
Answered by RevisionPrep's IB Educators
Electrophilic addition trips up more HL students than any other organic mechanism, mostly because of sloppy curly arrows rather than not understanding the chemistry. Here's what the IB actually expects you to know, where SL and HL differ, and the exact mistakes that cost marks in Paper 2.
The Concept: Mechanism & Content
Electrophilic addition reactions: what do you actually need to know for IB Chemistry?
You need to know that alkenes react with electrophiles like Br2, HBr and H2O across the C=C double bond, forming a saturated product. At HL you must also draw the full curly-arrow mechanism, including the carbocation intermediate, and apply Markovnikov's rule to unsymmetrical alkenes.
According to the IB Chemistry guide (first exams 2025), this sits under Reactivity 3.2 (patterns in organic reactions), with detailed mechanisms an AHL-only extension. SL students just need the reaction type and the bromine-water test; HL students are examined on the mechanism itself.
Quick tip: if a question says "outline the mechanism," it wants curly arrows and an intermediate — a word description alone won't get full marks.
What's the mechanism for electrophilic addition of bromine to alkenes?
Bromine's non-polar bond becomes polarised as it approaches the electron-rich C=C double bond, making one Br atom slightly positive. The pi bond attacks this Br, the Br–Br bond breaks heterolytically, and a carbocation intermediate forms. A bromide ion then attacks the positive carbon, giving the dibromoalkane.
Worked example — ethene + Br2:
- Br2 approaches C=C; induced dipole forms (Brδ+–Brδ−).
- Curly arrow from the pi bond to the Brδ+ atom.
- Second curly arrow from the Br–Br bond to the departing Br, forming Br⁻ and a carbocation on one carbon.
- Curly arrow from a lone pair on Br⁻ to the positive carbon.
- Product: 1,2-dibromoethane.
Common mistake: students draw the arrow starting from the Br atom itself rather than from the bond or lone pair — examiners mark this down every session.
Why do alkenes undergo electrophilic addition but arenes don't?
Alkenes have a localised, reactive pi bond that's easily attacked by electrophiles, so addition happens readily and destroys the double bond. Arenes like benzene have a delocalised ring of six pi electrons that gives extra stability, so they resist addition and undergo electrophilic substitution instead, which keeps the ring intact.
This is a favourite short-answer question ("explain why benzene undergoes substitution rather than addition"). The delocalisation energy of benzene — roughly 150 kJ/mol more stable than a hypothetical cyclohexatriene — is the reason substitution preserves the ring while addition would destroy that stabilisation.
What is Markovnikov's rule and when do I need it?
Markovnikov's rule says that when H–X adds across an unsymmetrical alkene, the hydrogen attaches to the carbon that already has more hydrogens, giving the more stable carbocation and the major product. You need it whenever a question asks for the major organic product of an unsymmetrical alkene reacting with HBr, HCl or H2O.
Worked example — propene + HBr: Propene: CH3–CH=CH2. H+ can add to C1 (giving a secondary carbocation at C2) or to C2 (giving a primary carbocation at C1). Secondary carbocations are more stable than primary ones, so H adds to C1. The major product is 2-bromopropane; 1-bromopropane is the minor product.
At HL, examiners expect you to justify this with carbocation stability, not just quote the rule.
Exam & Syllabus
Is electrophilic addition examined at both SL and HL?
Both levels know that alkenes undergo addition reactions and can identify them using the bromine-water decolourisation test. Only HL students are examined on the full curly-arrow mechanism, the carbocation intermediate and Markovnikov's rule — this extra depth appears as AHL-only content in the IB Chemistry guide.
| SL | HL | |
|---|---|---|
| Knows addition happens | Yes | Yes |
| Bromine-water test | Yes | Yes |
| Draws curly-arrow mechanism | No | Yes |
| Markovnikov's rule with justification | No | Yes |
What command terms are used for mechanism questions in IB Chemistry exams?
Expect "describe the mechanism", "outline" or "deduce", all of which require curly arrows showing electron movement, correct partial charges, and any intermediate drawn explicitly. "State" or "identify" questions, by contrast, just want the reagent, product or reaction type named — no mechanism needed.
Checking the command term first tells you how much detail to write. "Outline" typically wants a brief mechanism with key steps; "describe" wants every arrow and intermediate labelled. Losing marks here is usually about matching effort to command term, not missing chemistry.
How do I draw curly arrows correctly for electrophilic addition mechanisms?
A curly arrow always starts from a bond or a lone pair — never from an atom on its own — and points to where the electron pair ends up. For electrophilic addition, that means one arrow from the pi bond to the electrophile, and a second from the breaking bond to the leaving group.
Checklist before your next mock:
- Does every arrow start on a bond or lone pair, not an atom?
- Is the arrowhead a full curved head (two barbs), not a single-barb (that's for radicals)?
- Have you shown the carbocation with its correct positive charge and empty orbital?
- Does the final arrow come from a lone pair on the attacking ion?
Missing step 3 — forgetting to draw the intermediate at all — is the single most common reason HL students lose marks on this topic.
How to Study & Get a 7
What's the most common mistake students make with electrophilic addition mechanisms?
The most common mistake is drawing the curly arrow starting from an atom (like Br) instead of from the bond or lone pair, which examiners mark as a fundamental error even if the final product is correct. The second most common: forgetting to draw the carbocation intermediate entirely.
I've marked hundreds of mock papers on this topic, and it's nearly always the same two errors repeated — arrows from atoms, and missing intermediates. Practise drawing five or six mechanisms slowly, checking each arrow against the checklist above, rather than rushing through twenty.
How can I remember the difference between electrophilic addition and electrophilic substitution?
Addition happens to alkenes because the pi bond breaks and nothing leaves the molecule — two things join together across the double bond. Substitution happens to arenes because the delocalised ring stays intact and a hydrogen atom is replaced by something else, so one group swaps for another.
Quick memory hook: addition = alkene = bond breaks, atoms join. Substitution = arene = ring survives, one atom swaps for another. If the question shows a benzene ring, it's substitution; if it shows C=C, it's addition.
What past-paper style questions come up on electrophilic addition?
Typical questions ask you to draw the mechanism for an alkene reacting with HBr or Br2, predict the major product using Markovnikov's rule, explain why benzene resists addition, or identify an unknown compound from a positive bromine-water test in a practical-based question.
Three question types to practise:
- Full mechanism with curly arrows for a named alkene + HX.
- Major/minor product prediction with carbocation-stability justification.
- Data-based question linking a decolourised bromine-water result to an unsaturated functional group.
Comparisons & Choices
Electrophilic addition vs nucleophilic substitution: what's the difference and how do I know which applies?
Electrophilic addition happens to alkenes, where an electron-poor species attacks the electron-rich C=C bond and adds across it. Nucleophilic substitution happens to haloalkanes, where an electron-rich species replaces a halogen leaving group. Look at the starting functional group — a double bond means addition, a C–halogen bond means substitution.
This distinction is tested constantly because the two mechanisms use opposite-charged attacking species and completely different intermediates (carbocation vs transition state/carbocation for SN1, or a single step for SN2).
Is this topic harder in Chemistry HL than SL?
Yes — at HL, electrophilic addition adds a full curly-arrow mechanism, carbocation stability arguments and Markovnikov's rule on top of the SL requirement to simply recognise the reaction and its test. Students moving from SL-level organic chemistry often underestimate how much extra precision the HL mechanism demands.
If your child is choosing between SL and HL Chemistry, organic mechanisms (electrophilic addition here, plus SN1/SN2/E1 elimination under Reactivity 3.4) are where the HL workload genuinely jumps — worth factoring into subject-level choices alongside Maths and overall subject balance.
Electrophilic Addition vs Nucleophilic Substitution
| Feature | Electrophilic Addition | Nucleophilic Substitution |
| Substrate | Alkene (C=C) | Haloalkane (C–X) |
| Attacking species | Electrophile | Nucleophile |
| Bond change | Pi bond breaks | C–X bond breaks |
| Intermediate | Carbocation | Carbocation or transition state |
| Level examined in detail | HL only | HL only |
For step-by-step mechanism worked examples, Markovnikov practice questions and full Topical Worksheets on organic reaction mechanisms, explore the IB Chemistry resources on revisionprep.com.
