RevisionPrep FAQ
What Do IB Economics Command Terms Mean and How Are Marks Awarded?
Answered by RevisionPrep's IB Educators
Command terms tell you exactly what kind of thinking a mark scheme is paying for — 'explain' earns knowledge marks, 'evaluate' earns judgement marks, and mixing them up is the single most common reason strong students lose marks. Here's how the marking actually works, paper by paper.
Understanding Command Terms
What do IB Economics command terms mean and how are marks awarded?
Command terms set the ceiling on what marks are available. Lower-order terms like 'define' or 'explain' award knowledge and application marks (AO1/AO2); higher-order terms like 'discuss', 'evaluate' or 'to what extent' unlock analysis and evaluation marks (AO3) — you can't reach top bands without them, however good your diagram is.
According to the IB Economics guide (first exams 2024), Paper 1 essays are marked using levels of response, not a checklist — examiners place your whole answer in a band, then decide where within it based on how well you've met the command term's demand. Quick tip: underline the command term before you plan, not after you've written your intro.
What's the difference between 'explain', 'discuss' and 'evaluate' in IB Economics?
'Explain' wants a clear chain of reasoning — cause, effect, consequence, usually with a diagram. 'Discuss' wants both sides presented with reasoned points. 'Evaluate' wants a judgement: which side is stronger, and why, given assumptions, magnitude, time frame or context. Evaluate without a stated judgement caps your mark regardless of content.
Worked example: for 'explain how a subsidy corrects a positive externality', you draw the diagram and trace MSB/MSC through to the new equilibrium — that's it, full marks available without a verdict. For 'evaluate the effectiveness of a subsidy', the same diagram only gets you into the middle band; you need a line like 'however, this assumes the government can accurately measure the external benefit, which is rarely true in practice' to reach the top band.
What does 'to what extent' mean in an IB Economics essay question?
'To what extent' is the highest-demand command term in the guide — it asks you to weigh competing factors and reach a supported conclusion about degree, not just yes/no. Markers reward answers that explicitly compare the strength of arguments and state a final position, ideally referencing context given in the question.
Common mistake: writing two balanced paragraphs and a one-line conclusion that just restates both sides. That reads as 'discuss', not 'to what extent' — the mark scheme wants a reasoned judgement, e.g. 'in the short run X dominates, but over a longer time horizon Y becomes more significant because…'.
How Marks Are Awarded
How is Paper 1 marked in IB Economics?
Paper 1 is a two-part extended-response essay marked out of 30: part (a), usually 'explain', is worth 10 marks; part (b), usually 'discuss' or 'evaluate', is worth 20 marks. Both parts use levels-of-response mark schemes — examiners judge the whole response against band descriptors rather than ticking individual points.
Typical band shape for part (b) — 20 marks:
- Level 1 (1-6): limited relevance, no diagram or incorrect diagram
- Level 2 (7-12): relevant theory, correct diagram, some analysis
- Level 3 (13-16): sound analysis, developed chains of reasoning
- Level 4 (17-20): as above, plus explicit, well-supported evaluation
How are Paper 2 and Paper 3 data response questions marked in IB Economics?
Paper 2 (SL and HL) uses real-world data extracts with structured sub-questions worth 2 to 15 marks each, rising in demand from 'define' to 'evaluate'. Paper 3 (HL only) is quantitative and qualitative, testing calculations, diagrams and short written analysis — marks for working are awarded even if your final numerical answer is wrong.
Worked example: a Paper 2 question might run (a)(i) define 'price elasticity of demand' — 2 marks; (ii) using the data, calculate PED — 4 marks including method; (iii) explain one factor affecting PED — 4 marks; (b) evaluate a policy using the data — 15 marks. Losing the (a)(iii) marks by forgetting the diagram is one of the most common errors I see in mocks.
What is the difference between AO1, AO2 and AO3 marks in IB Economics?
AO1 tests knowledge of terms, theories and diagrams. AO2 tests application — using theory correctly with the specific data, context or diagram given. AO3 tests analysis and evaluation — chains of reasoning and reasoned judgement. Command terms map directly onto these: 'define' and 'describe' sit in AO1, 'apply' and 'explain' in AO2, 'discuss' and 'evaluate' in AO3.
You cannot pick up AO3 marks by writing more AO1 content — a longer definition doesn't become an evaluation. Examiners are trained to spot 'evaluation by assertion' (stating 'this policy is effective' with no reasoning) and it scores no higher than a mid-band answer.
Exam Structure & Syllabus
How many papers are there in IB Economics SL and HL?
SL students sit two papers: Paper 1 (extended response) and Paper 2 (data response). HL students sit those same two papers plus Paper 3, a quantitative and qualitative paper unique to HL. All students also complete an internally assessed portfolio of three commentaries based on published news articles.
According to the IB Economics guide (first assessments 2024), external assessment weightings are: SL — Paper 1 30%, Paper 2 40%, IA 30%. HL — Paper 1 20%, Paper 2 30%, Paper 3 30%, IA 20%.
What's the difference between SL and HL Economics exams?
HL Economics covers everything SL covers, plus extra HL-only content in each unit and quantitative skills tested on the dedicated Paper 3. HL exams are longer overall and the internal assessment carries a slightly lower weighting because the extra paper makes up the difference. Command terms and mark scheme style are identical across both levels.
What diagrams do I need to draw in IB Economics exams?
Every diagram must have labelled axes, correctly labelled curves, and a clearly marked equilibrium or shift — an unlabelled diagram earns no AO2 marks even if the reasoning around it is perfect. Common ones examined every session include supply and demand shifts, market failure diagrams (externalities), and the Keynesian/monetarist AD-AS models at HL.
Quick tip: draw the diagram first, in pencil if allowed, before you write a word of prose — students who write the essay first tend to bolt on a rushed, poorly labelled diagram at the end, which costs marks even when the written analysis is strong.
Comparisons & Choices
Is IB Economics hard compared to other DP subjects?
IB Economics sits in the middle of the DP difficulty range — the content is less mathematically demanding than Physics or Maths AA, but the mark schemes reward a specific essay-writing skill (structured evaluation) that takes real practice to master, not just content revision. Students who treat it as 'just reading' tend to underperform relative to their effort.
In my experience, the students who struggle most aren't weak on theory — they're weak on converting theory into the evaluative sentences the mark scheme is actually looking for. That's a trainable skill, not a talent, which is good news for a subject often started from scratch in Year 12.
How is IB Economics graded compared to A-Level Economics?
Both qualifications assess similar economic content, but IB Economics uses a 1-7 scale combining exam papers with an internally assessed portfolio, while A-Level Economics is exam-only with grades A*-E. IB's command-term mark schemes place more explicit, structured weight on evaluation across every essay question than most A-Level boards do.
How to Study & Get a 7
How can I improve my evaluation marks in IB Economics?
Build a habit of ending every analytical paragraph with a linking evaluative phrase — 'however, this assumes…', 'in the short run… but over time…', 'this depends on the magnitude of…' — rather than saving evaluation for one final paragraph. Mark schemes reward evaluation woven through the answer, not bolted on at the end.
3 things to check before your next mock:
- Does every major point have a stated assumption or limitation attached?
- Have you used the specific data or context given in the question, not generic theory?
- Does your conclusion make a judgement, not just a summary?
What resources help most for mastering command terms and mark schemes?
Practising against real past-paper mark schemes — reading the level descriptors before you attempt the question, not after — teaches you what examiners actually reward far faster than re-reading notes. On revisionprep.com, the Economics question bank and Topical Worksheets are built around command-term practice, with Mock Papers to test full timed responses under real conditions.
IB Economics SL vs HL: Exam Structure
| Feature | SL | HL |
| Papers sat | Paper 1, Paper 2 | Paper 1, Paper 2, Paper 3 |
| Paper 1 weighting | 30% | 20% |
| Paper 2 weighting | 40% | 30% |
| Paper 3 | Not sat | 30%, quantitative + qualitative |
| Internal assessment | 30% (3 commentaries) | 20% (3 commentaries) |
| Command terms used | Same as HL | Same as SL |
For structured practice against real command terms, work through the IB Economics question bank, Topical Worksheets and timed Mock Papers on revisionprep.com.
