RevisionPrep
Back to all FAQs

RevisionPrep FAQ

MYP Physics: Designing a Physics Investigation (Criterion B)

Answered by RevisionPrep's IB Educators

Criterion B — Inquiring and designing — is where you turn a physics question into a plan someone else could actually run: a testable hypothesis with real reasoning, clearly controlled variables, and a safe, repeatable method. Answered by RevisionPrep's IB Educators, this page covers what examiners reward, the mistakes that cap marks at level 4, and how it compares to the DP Physics IA.

Understanding Criterion B

Designing a physics investigation: what do MYP Physics students need to know?

Criterion B assesses four things: stating a clear problem or research question, writing a testable hypothesis backed by scientific reasoning, identifying and explaining how you'll control variables, and designing a safe, logical, replicable method with the right equipment and enough trials to spot patterns in your data.

The MYP Sciences guide sets out four strands (i–iv), each contributing to a single best-fit mark out of 8:

  • i. Explain a problem or question to be tested
  • ii. Formulate and explain a testable hypothesis using scientific reasoning
  • iii. Explain how variables will be manipulated and how data will be collected
  • iv. Design a logical, complete and safe method, including appropriate materials and equipment

All four criteria (A, B, C, D) are marked out of 8, giving 32 points total per assessed task.

What is MYP Physics Criterion B?

Criterion B, Inquiring and designing, is one of four MYP Sciences criteria alongside Knowing and understanding, Processing and evaluating, and Reflecting on the impacts of science. It measures how well you turn a scientific question into a testable, safe, repeatable investigation — not how impressive your final results are.

Quick tip: examiners mark the plan, not the outcome. A messy graph from a well-designed investigation can still score a level 7–8 on Criterion B, because that criterion closes before data collection even starts. Teachers usually assess it at least twice across the year, once per unit involving a hands-on investigation.

What are the four strands of Criterion B: Inquiring and designing?

Criterion B has four strands: (i) explaining the problem or question being tested, (ii) formulating and explaining a testable hypothesis using scientific reasoning, (iii) explaining how variables will be manipulated and how data will be collected, and (iv) designing a logical, safe, complete method with appropriate materials.

The command terms matter: 'explain' (strands i, iii) wants a justification, not a bare statement; 'formulate' (strand ii) wants you to construct the hypothesis yourself, not copy a textbook prediction; 'design' (strand iv) wants an original method, even if it's inspired by a known experiment.

How to design a strong investigation

How do I write a good hypothesis for a physics investigation?

A strong hypothesis predicts a specific relationship between two variables and explains why, using physics reasoning — not just 'I think X will happen.' Examiners want the mechanism behind your prediction: link it to a law, formula or concept you've actually studied in class.

Worked example: "If the length of a pendulum increases, the period of oscillation will increase, because a longer string increases the arc distance travelled per swing while the restoring force from gravity doesn't scale enough to compensate — consistent with T = 2π√(L/g)."

That's a level 7–8 hypothesis: it names the variables, predicts direction, and cites a formula. Swap the reasoning clause for a vague "because physics says so" and it drops straight into band 3–4.

How do I identify and control variables in a physics investigation?

Name three variable types clearly: the independent variable you deliberately change, the dependent variable you measure, and controlled variables you keep fixed so they don't distort your result. Strand iii wants you to explain how each is measured or controlled and why that control actually matters.

Variable typePendulum exampleHow it's controlled
IndependentString length (20, 40, 60, 80, 100 cm)Measured with a metre ruler before each trial
DependentPeriod (time for 10 oscillations ÷ 10)Timed with a stopwatch, three repeats averaged
ControlledBob mass, release angleSame bob used throughout; angle fixed at 10° with a protractor

Common mistake: writing "keep everything else the same" with no specifics. Name the actual variable and how you'll physically hold it constant.

How do I design a safe and logical method for my physics investigation?

A level 7–8 method reads like an instruction manual a stranger could follow without asking you a question: numbered steps, exact equipment with a stated range or precision, at least five data points per variable, repeat trials for reliability, and a safety measure relevant to your actual apparatus.

  1. List equipment with precision (e.g. "metre ruler, ±0.1 cm")
  2. Describe the setup in order, referring to a labelled diagram if you have one
  3. State the independent variable's full range (e.g. five lengths, 20–100 cm)
  4. State the number of repeats (minimum three trials per value) and how you'll average them
  5. Name one real safety or risk-control step tied to your equipment — e.g. "secure the clamp stand to prevent it toppling" rather than a generic "be careful"
  6. State how you'll record raw data (a table with correct units and uncertainty column)

How long should I spend designing a physics investigation?

Plan on roughly three working sessions for MYP 4-5: one for background research and drafting the hypothesis, one for identifying variables and writing the method, and one for teacher feedback before you finalise. Some schools compress this into a single lab double period plus homework — ask your teacher which model applies.

Quick tip: don't skip the feedback step. Teachers often catch a missing safety point or an unclear variable in thirty seconds that would otherwise cost you a whole achievement band.

Grades, marks & common mistakes

What mistakes stop students reaching level 7-8 in Criterion B?

In years of marking these, three mistakes repeatedly cap work at level 4: a hypothesis that predicts without explaining the physics behind it, vague variable control like "keep everything else the same" with no specifics named, and a method missing a measurable range or repeat trials.

Checklist before you submit:

  1. Does my hypothesis name a mechanism, not just an outcome?
  2. Have I named every controlled variable and how I'll fix it — not just said "the rest stays the same"?
  3. Does my independent variable have at least five stated values?
  4. Have I included repeat trials and said how I'll average them?
  5. Is there one genuine, apparatus-specific safety measure, not a generic "wear goggles"?

How is Criterion B graded in MYP Physics?

Criterion B is marked 0–8 using four achievement bands — 1–2, 3–4, 5–6 and 7–8 — each with its own descriptor in the MYP Sciences guide. Your teacher awards one best-fit mark based on which band your work matches most closely across all four strands, not an average of separate strand scores.

BandTypical descriptor
1–2States a problem; hypothesis with little reasoning; method has gaps
3–4Testable question stated; some reasoning; method mostly complete, limited variable control
5–6Clear question; hypothesis explained with scientific reasoning; logical method, variables addressed
7–8Focused question; correct scientific reasoning; complete, safe, replicable method with precise variable control

How many marks is Criterion B worth in MYP Physics?

Criterion B is worth 8 marks, the same weighting as Criteria A, C and D, giving 32 raw points across a full assessed task. Schools then convert this raw total into the 1–7 grade used on MYP reports, using grade-boundary descriptors set by the school's curriculum team, which vary slightly year to year.

Because each criterion is marked separately and independently, a weak Criterion B mark doesn't automatically pull down your Criterion C or D scores — they're assessed against their own descriptors, using your data and conclusions rather than your design.

Comparisons & choices

Is MYP Physics Criterion B the same as the DP Physics internal assessment?

No — related but not equivalent. Criterion B covers only the design stage (question, hypothesis, variables, method), while the DP Physics internal assessment is a full investigation report including data, analysis and evaluation, marked against five separate criteria. According to the IB, first exams for the current DP Physics guide were 2025.

AspectMYP Criterion BDP Physics IA
Stage assessedDesign onlyFull investigation: design, data, analysis, evaluation
Marked out of8 points24 marks, 5 criteria
Typical length1–2 pages6–12 pages, ~10 hours of work
Who marks itClass teacherTeacher-marked, externally moderated

A well-designed MYP investigation is genuinely good practice for the DP IA — the variable control and method-writing habits carry over directly.

How can parents support my child with their MYP Physics investigation?

Don't write the hypothesis for them — ask questions instead: "why do you think that will happen?", "what exactly are you keeping the same?", "could someone else follow these steps without you there?" Those three questions target precisely what Criterion B rewards, and they take about ten minutes at the kitchen table.

Common misconception: parents often assume a tidier graph or a "correct" result matters most. It doesn't — Criterion B closes before data collection begins, so a well-reasoned design with an unexpected result can still score highly, provided the plan itself was logical and safe.

Resources & practice

What resources help with MYP Physics investigation design?

Look for materials built around the actual four strands, not a generic "scientific method" template: modelled hypotheses that show their reasoning, variable tables like the ones examiners expect, and full sample investigations you can check against the level 7–8 descriptors before submitting your own work.

A practical routine: read the level 7–8 descriptor first, draft your hypothesis, then check it back against that descriptor before you move on to the method — catching gaps early is far quicker than rewriting a finished draft.

MYP Criterion B vs DP Physics Internal Assessment

AspectMYP Criterion BDP Physics IA
Stage assessedDesign onlyDesign, data, analysis, evaluation
Marked out of8 points24 marks, 5 criteria
Typical length1–2 pages6–12 pages, ~10 hours
Who marks itClass teacherTeacher-marked, IB-moderated
Current guideOngoing, MYP 4-5 unitsFirst exams 2025

For modelled hypotheses, variable tables and full sample investigations mapped to the Criterion B strands, see the MYP Physics Revision Notes and Topical Worksheets on revisionprep.com.

Related reading