RevisionPrep FAQ
IB Chemistry: Covalent Bonding & Lewis Structures FAQ
Answered by RevisionPrep's IB Educators
Covalent bonding and Lewis structures catch out more IB Chemistry students than almost any other Structure topic — it looks simple until formal charge and expanded octets show up at HL. Short answer: draw accurate Lewis structures, apply VSEPR for shape, then explain polarity and hybridisation. Answered by RevisionPrep's IB Educators, who've taught and marked this exact skill for years.
Concept & Content: What You Actually Need to Know
Covalent bonding & Lewis structures: what do you actually need to know for IB Chemistry?
You need to draw Lewis structures showing bonding pairs and lone pairs, use VSEPR to predict shape and bond angle, and explain polarity from electronegativity differences. At HL, add formal charge, expanded octets, sigma/pi bonds and hybridisation. This all sits under Structure 2.2, The covalent model, in the current IB Chemistry guide.
SL core skills:
- Draw Lewis (electron dot) structures including multiple bonds and coordination (dative) bonds
- Apply VSEPR to name shapes and estimate bond angles
- Explain bond polarity using electronegativity difference
- Describe basic resonance (e.g. ozone)
HL adds:
- Formal charge to choose the most plausible structure
- Expanded octets for period 3+ elements (e.g. SF6, PCl5)
- Sigma and pi bonding, orbital overlap
- Hybridisation (sp, sp2, sp3) and benzene delocalisation
According to the IB, first exams for the current DP Chemistry guide were in 2025, and this content is examined on both Paper 1 and Paper 2.
How do you draw a Lewis structure step by step?
Count every valence electron in the molecule first, then pick a central atom — usually the least electronegative, never hydrogen. Join atoms with single bonds, distribute the rest as lone pairs to complete octets, and convert a lone pair into a second or third bond if any atom is short of eight electrons.
Worked example: CO₂
- Total valence electrons: C (4) + 2×O (6) = 16
- Central atom: C, bonded to two O atoms
- Single bonds use 4 electrons, leaving 12
- Give each O three lone pairs (12 electrons) — but C now only has 4 electrons around it, not 8
- Move one lone pair from each O into a second bond: O=C=O
Final structure: two C=O double bonds, two lone pairs on each oxygen, none on carbon. Total electrons still 16. Carbon ends up linear and sp hybridised at HL.
Quick tip: always recount your total electrons at the end — a structure with the wrong total is an automatic mark loss, whatever the shape looks like.
What is formal charge and how do you calculate it?
Formal charge is a bookkeeping tool (HL only) used to pick the most realistic Lewis structure when more than one arrangement is possible. It's calculated as valence electrons minus non-bonding electrons minus half the bonding electrons. The best structure usually has formal charges closest to zero, with any negative charge on the more electronegative atom.
Worked example: carbon monoxide, CO Structure: :C≡O: (triple bond, one lone pair on each atom)
- Carbon: 4 (valence) − 2 (non-bonding) − 3 (half of 6 bonding electrons) = −1
- Oxygen: 6 − 2 − 3 = +1
This matches the real, measured dipole of CO, where the negative end sits on carbon despite oxygen being more electronegative — a favourite exam twist because students expect the opposite. It's exactly the kind of result formal charge is designed to explain.
What are expanded octets, and when do you need them at HL?
An expanded octet is when a central atom has more than eight electrons around it — only possible for elements in period 3 or below, because their larger size and available orbitals can accommodate extra electron pairs. Classic HL examples are SF6, PCl5 and SF4, where sulfur or phosphorus exceeds the octet while surrounding atoms keep normal octets.
Common mistake: students try to give oxygen or nitrogen an expanded octet — that's never allowed, since period 2 elements have no accessible orbitals beyond the 2s/2p set. If your central atom is in period 2, the octet rule is fixed at eight, full stop.
How does VSEPR theory build on Lewis structures to predict molecular shape?
VSEPR takes the electron domains from your completed Lewis structure — bonding pairs and lone pairs both count — and arranges them to minimise repulsion. Lone pairs repel more strongly than bonding pairs, which compresses bond angles below the ideal geometric value whenever lone pairs are present on the central atom.
Comparison: NH₃ vs CH₄
| Molecule | Electron domains | Lone pairs | Bond angle |
|---|---|---|---|
| CH₄ | 4 | 0 | 109.5° |
| NH₃ | 4 | 1 | ~107° |
| H₂O | 4 | 2 | ~104.5° |
Same tetrahedral electron geometry each time, but the molecular shape and angle shrink as lone pairs increase — that's the repulsion order lone-lone > lone-bond > bond-bond in action.
Difficulty & Common Mistakes
Why do students lose marks on Lewis structure questions in the IB exam?
In my experience marking mock papers, the same three errors account for most lost marks: forgetting lone pairs on outer atoms, choosing the wrong central atom, and miscounting electrons for an ion (forgetting to add or remove electrons for the charge). Each one is a quick fix once you know to check for it.
Quick checklist before you submit any Lewis structure answer:
- Did you count electrons correctly, including ± for ion charge?
- Does every atom (except expanded-octet cases) have exactly eight electrons around it?
- Are all lone pairs shown, not just bonding pairs?
- Have you drawn the correct number of multiple bonds, not just single bonds everywhere?
- For HL: did the question ask for formal charge, hybridisation or shape as well as the structure?
What's the difference between resonance structures and a single Lewis structure?
A single Lewis structure shows one fixed arrangement of electrons, but some molecules — ozone, the carbonate ion, benzene — can't be described accurately by just one. Resonance structures are two or more valid Lewis structures with the same atom positions but different electron placement; the real molecule is a hybrid, an average, not a flicker between them.
Benzene is the HL example examiners return to most: six equivalent C–C bonds, each with bond length between a single and double bond, explained by delocalised electrons across the ring rather than three fixed alternating double bonds.
How do you determine whether a molecule is polar from its Lewis structure?
First check individual bond polarity using electronegativity differences, then look at the molecule's overall shape from VSEPR. If the bond dipoles are arranged symmetrically, they cancel and the molecule is non-polar overall, even if individual bonds are polar. If they don't cancel, the molecule is polar.
CO₂ vs H₂O:
- CO₂: linear, two identical C=O dipoles pointing in opposite directions → cancel → non-polar
- H₂O: bent, two O–H dipoles at ~104.5° → don't cancel → polar
Same idea, opposite outcome, purely because of shape.
Exam & Syllabus
Which syllabus topic covers covalent bonding in the current IB Chemistry guide?
Covalent bonding and Lewis structures fall under Structure 2.2, The covalent model, in the current DP Chemistry guide, part of the Structure strand alongside ionic and metallic bonding (2.1) and the periodic table (1.3). According to the IB, this guide was first examined in 2025, replacing the previous topic-based syllabus structure.
SL students cover the core content of 2.2; HL students study the same subtopic in greater depth, adding formal charge, expanded octets, sigma/pi bonding and hybridisation as separate assessed content within the same guide section.
Do Paper 1 and Paper 2 test Lewis structures differently?
Yes. Paper 1 tends to test recognition — picking the correct shape, polarity or bond angle from multiple-choice options — without asking you to draw anything. Paper 2 is where you actually draw full Lewis structures, justify formal charge, name VSEPR shapes and, at HL, explain hybridisation in extended response.
Command terms to watch for:
| Command term | What it demands |
|---|---|
| Deduce | State the shape/structure with brief reasoning |
| Draw | Full Lewis structure, correct lone pairs |
| Explain | Link structure to a property (e.g. polarity, bond angle) |
| Determine | Calculate formal charge or predict the more stable structure |
SL vs HL & Comparisons
Is covalent bonding harder at HL than SL?
Yes, noticeably — HL keeps everything from SL and adds formal charge, expanded octets, sigma/pi bonding and hybridisation, all of which require more abstract reasoning than simply drawing a structure and naming a shape. Most students I teach find hybridisation the hardest single idea in this whole subtopic.
See the comparison table below for the exact content split between SL and HL.
How does IB's treatment of covalent bonding compare to A-Level chemistry bonding?
Broadly similar depth: both IB HL and UK A-Level chemistry cover dot-and-cross (Lewis) diagrams, VSEPR shapes and hybridisation to a comparable standard. The main difference is that IB explicitly assesses formal charge as a decision-making tool for choosing between structures, which most A-Level specifications don't name as a separate skill.
If your child is weighing IB against A-Levels for chemistry, bonding is not the subtopic that should decide it — the demand is similar, though IB's concept-based framing (linking structure to reactivity across the whole course) asks students to make more explicit connections between topics.
Study Resources & Support
What's the most effective way to practice Lewis structures before mocks?
Timed, repeated practice on a mix of neutral molecules, ions and expanded-octet species beats reading notes every time — you need to build the electron-counting habit until it's automatic. Work through past-paper Structure 2.2 questions and mark yourself against the actual mark scheme, not just a model answer.
3 things to check before your next mock:
- Can you draw a correct structure for an ion (e.g. NO₃⁻, SO₄²⁻) without hesitating over the charge adjustment?
- Can you justify, using formal charge, why one resonance structure is more plausible than another?
- Can you go from Lewis structure → VSEPR shape → polarity in one continuous answer, the way Paper 2 usually asks it?
On revisionprep.com, the Topical Worksheets for Structure 2.2 and the Question Bank both group past-paper style questions by exactly this progression, so you can drill the weak link rather than redoing everything.
How can parents help a child who's stuck on bonding and structure topics?
The most useful thing you can do isn't reteaching the chemistry — it's making sure your child is practising the right way: timed past-paper questions marked against real mark schemes, not just re-reading notes. If formal charge or hybridisation keeps coming up as a weak spot in feedback, that's worth flagging to their teacher directly.
Revision Notes on revisionprep.com break Structure 2.2 into the SL core and HL extension separately, which helps if your child needs to isolate exactly which part — Lewis structures, VSEPR, or the HL-only additions — is actually causing the mark loss.
Covalent Bonding: SL vs HL Content (Structure 2.2)
| Topic | SL | HL |
| Lewis structures | Single/double/triple bonds, lone pairs | Same, plus formal charge check |
| Octet rule | Standard octet for most atoms | Expanded octets, period 3+ |
| Bonding model | VSEPR shapes and bond angles | Adds sigma/pi bonds and hybridisation |
| Resonance | Basic idea, e.g. ozone | Includes benzene delocalisation in depth |
| Typical exam demand | Draw and name the shape | Draw, justify formal charge, explain hybridisation |
For structured practice on Structure 2.2, revisionprep.com's Chemistry Question Bank, Revision Notes and Topical Worksheets break covalent bonding into SL-core and HL-extension questions, marked against real IB mark schemes.
