RevisionPrep FAQ
MYP Chemistry: Designing a Chemistry Investigation (Criterion B)
Answered by RevisionPrep's IB Educators
Criterion B — Inquiring and designing — is where MYP Chemistry students turn a question into a testable plan: explain the problem, write a reasoned hypothesis, identify variables, and design a safe, ethical method. Having marked hundreds of these plans, I can tell you the gap between level 4 and level 8 is almost always explanation, not effort. Answered by RevisionPrep's IB Educators.
Understanding Criterion B
What is designing a chemistry investigation in MYP Chemistry?
Designing a chemistry investigation is Criterion B in MYP Sciences — the strand where you turn a scientific question into a testable plan. You explain the problem, write a hypothesis backed by scientific reasoning, identify variables, and describe a safe, ethical method for collecting reliable data.
Criterion B is marked out of 8, alongside Criteria A (Knowing and understanding), C (Processing and evaluating) and D (Reflecting on the impacts of science). It's assessed on a real practical or a design task — not a written test — so the quality of your explanation matters as much as the science itself.
What are the four strands of Criterion B in MYP Sciences?
Criterion B has four strands assessed together out of 8 marks: explaining the problem or question, formulating and explaining a testable hypothesis, explaining how variables will be manipulated and data collected, and designing a method that's safe, ethical, and environmentally sound.
At the top band (7-8), the guide expects you to:
- Explain a problem/question with clear scientific context, not just restate it
- Justify your hypothesis using named chemistry concepts (collision theory, bonding, equilibrium, etc.)
- Explain — not just list — how variables are controlled and data recorded
- Design a fully appropriate, safe, ethical and environmentally sound method for your exact experiment
What is a testable hypothesis in MYP Chemistry, and how do I write one?
A testable hypothesis predicts a relationship between two variables and explains that prediction using chemistry you already know — not just a guess. Top-band answers use the structure: "If [independent variable] changes, then [dependent variable] will [effect], because [scientific reasoning]."
Worked example (rates of reaction): "If the concentration of hydrochloric acid increases, then the rate of reaction with marble chips will increase, because a higher concentration means more acid particles per unit volume, raising the frequency of successful collisions with calcium carbonate particles (collision theory)."
Notice the "because" clause names actual content — that's what separates a level 6 hypothesis from a level 8 one.
What's the difference between independent, dependent and controlled variables?
The independent variable is the one you deliberately change; the dependent variable is what you measure as a result; controlled variables are everything else you keep constant so the test is fair. Mixing these up is the single most common reason students lose marks on strand iii of Criterion B.
Common mistake: listing a controlled variable (like temperature) as something you're "testing," when really you're just holding it fixed. Say how you'll control it — a thermostatted water bath, not just "keep temperature the same."
How to Get a 7-8 in Criterion B
How do I get a level 7-8 in Criterion B for MYP Chemistry?
A 7-8 needs all four strands explained in depth, not just stated: a clearly justified research question, a hypothesis with real scientific reasoning, variables identified with a logical method for controlling them, and a plan naming specific safety, ethical, and environmental considerations for your exact experiment.
Checklist before you submit your plan:
- Does my hypothesis have a "because," backed by named chemistry content?
- Have I said how I'll control each variable, not just what it is?
- Is my method detailed enough that a classmate could repeat it exactly?
- Have I named the specific hazard of each chemical, not a generic warning?
- Have I explained why I chose this number of repeats and data points?
What common mistakes lose marks in Criterion B investigations?
The three mistakes I see most often: hypotheses that predict but never explain why, methods that name variables without saying how they'll be controlled, and generic safety notes like "wear goggles" instead of hazard-specific ones tied to the actual chemicals in your experiment.
Quick tip: name the specific hazard — "dilute hydrochloric acid is an irritant, so wear splash-proof goggles and nitrile gloves" — rather than a blanket safety line copied into every write-up. Examiners notice generic language immediately.
How long should my research question and hypothesis be?
There's no word count — length isn't the criterion, reasoning is. A strong research question is one clear sentence naming both variables; a strong hypothesis is one or two sentences with a "because" clause explaining the prediction using chemistry content you've actually studied.
A one-sentence research question example: "How does the concentration of hydrochloric acid affect the rate of reaction with marble chips?" Short, specific, names both variables — that's exactly what strand i rewards.
How many trials/repeats do I need for a good chemistry investigation design?
Most IB Chemistry teachers expect at least three repeats per data point so you can calculate a mean and spot anomalies. Criterion B rewards you for explaining why repeats improve reliability, not just stating a number — five repeats is safer for fast or hard-to-time reactions.
Worked example: three timed trials at 30°C give 12.1s, 12.3s and 18.9s. The third is an anomaly — likely a timing error — so you'd exclude it and report the mean of the first two (12.2s), explaining the exclusion in your plan's data-handling section rather than ignoring it.
Assessment & Syllabus Specifics
How is Criterion B graded in MYP Chemistry?
Criterion B is marked out of 8 using four achievement level bands (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8), each describing how fully you explain the problem, hypothesis, variables, and method. According to the IB's MYP: From Principles into Practice guide, all four criteria (A-D) combine for a final 1-7 subject grade using standard MYP grade boundaries.
| Level band | What examiners expect |
|---|---|
| 1-2 | States a problem/hypothesis with little or no explanation |
| 3-4 | Partial explanation; variables identified but not fully controlled |
| 5-6 | Adequate explanation of most strands; method mostly appropriate |
| 7-8 | Detailed, reasoned explanation of all four strands; safe, ethical, precise method |
What's the difference between Criterion B and Criterion C in MYP Sciences?
Criterion B (Inquiring and designing) is about planning the investigation before you touch any equipment — hypothesis, variables, method. Criterion C (Processing and evaluating) is about what happens after: analysing results, calculating uncertainty, and evaluating validity. You can't score well on C with a weak Criterion B plan.
Think of it as before-and-after: a vague independent variable in Criterion B ("different amounts of acid") makes it almost impossible to write a precise evaluation in Criterion C, because there's nothing specific to analyse against.
Do MYP Chemistry students design an investigation for every unit?
No — most MYP Chemistry courses assess Criterion B two or three times a year, not every unit, since a full investigation design takes real class time to teach properly. Your teacher will tell you which practicals count as summative Criterion B tasks versus which are just formative practice.
Formative practicals are still worth doing properly — they're where you rehearse the hypothesis-writing and variable-control skills you'll need when the summative task actually counts towards your grade.
Comparisons & Progression (For Parents)
Does MYP Criterion B prepare students for the IB Diploma Chemistry internal assessment?
Yes — Criterion B builds exactly the skills the DP Chemistry internal assessment demands: a focused research question, a justified method, and identified variables. Students who've practised this rigorously in MYP 4-5 generally find the DP IA's exploration and method sections far less daunting in Year 12.
The DP Chemistry guide (first examined 2025) assesses the internal assessment against criteria including Exploration and Analysis — the direct descendants of MYP's Criterion B and C thinking, just applied to an independently chosen investigation rather than a set practical.
Is designing investigations harder in MYP 4-5 than MYP 1-3?
Yes, noticeably — MYP 4-5 expects independent scientific reasoning behind every choice, not just correct steps. Where MYP 1-3 might accept "I will change the temperature," MYP 4-5 wants "because increasing temperature raises particle kinetic energy, increasing collision frequency and rate," referencing named chemistry content.
Table: MYP 1-3 vs MYP 4-5 expectations
| Feature | MYP 1-3 | MYP 4-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis | States a prediction | Predicts and explains why |
| Variables | Identified | Identified and control method explained |
| Method | Followed given steps | Designed and justified independently |
Resources & Support
What resources help my child practise designing chemistry investigations at home?
Past practical write-ups, a copy of the Sciences subject-specific guidance for command terms, and worked exemplar investigations marked at the correct achievement level all help. On revisionprep.com, the MYP Chemistry Revision Notes and Topical Worksheets include practice research questions and sample hypotheses to mark against real level descriptors.
If your child is stuck on the reasoning behind a hypothesis specifically, going back over the relevant topic's Revision Notes first usually fixes it faster than rewriting the plan itself — the gap is almost always missing content knowledge, not writing skill.
Types of Variables in a Chemistry Investigation
| Variable type | Definition | Example (rates of reaction) |
| Independent | What you change | Concentration of HCl |
| Dependent | What you measure | Time for reaction to finish |
| Controlled | What you keep constant | Temperature, chip size, acid volume |
For practice research questions, sample hypotheses marked against real achievement levels, and full worked investigation plans, see the MYP Chemistry Revision Notes and Topical Worksheets on revisionprep.com.
