RevisionPrep
Back to all FAQs

RevisionPrep FAQ

MYP Maths Investigating Patterns Tasks: Criterion B Explained

Answered by RevisionPrep's IB Educators

Investigating patterns tasks are how MYP Maths tests Criterion B: Investigating Patterns. You answer them by working systematically from simple cases to a general rule, then justifying and testing it. Most students lose marks not on the maths but on the write-up — this hub fixes that.

Understanding the task

How do you answer MYP Maths questions on investigating patterns tasks?

You answer them by moving through four stages: generate simple cases, spot a numerical or visual pattern, describe it in words then in a general algebraic rule, and finally justify or prove why the rule works. Criterion B rewards the reasoning trail, not just the final formula.

Here's the process I walk every class through:

  1. Build a table. List at least 4-5 cases (n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) with their values worked out fully — don't skip to the pattern.
  2. Describe verbally first. Write a sentence like "each term increases by 3 more than the last" before touching algebra.
  3. Generalise. Convert the verbal rule into an algebraic expression, usually in terms of n.
  4. Test it. Substitute an untried value (not one from your original table) to check the rule holds.
  5. Justify why, not just that — link the rule back to the structure of the pattern (e.g. why it's quadratic, why there's a common difference).

Quick tip: examiners specifically look for you noticing what happens with a case you didn't originally list — that's what separates level 5-6 from 7-8.

What is Criterion B in MYP Maths?

Criterion B — Investigating Patterns — assesses a student's ability to select mathematical problem-solving techniques, describe patterns as relationships/rules, and generalise correctly. According to the MYP: Mathematics guide, it's marked out of 8, alongside Criteria A, C and D, each also out of 8.

The MYP Mathematics guide's Criterion B strand descriptors ask students to:

  • Apply mathematical problem-solving techniques to recognise patterns
  • Describe patterns as relationships or general rules
  • Verify whether the pattern works for other examples

Unlike Criterion A (Knowing and Understanding), which tests applying known formulae, Criterion B specifically tests whether a student can derive a rule from scratch when none is given.

What does a Level 7-8 investigating patterns response actually look like?

A level 7-8 response selects an efficient strategy, states a correct general rule with full justification of why it works, and tests the rule against an unfamiliar case with a clear explanation of the result. It reads like a mini mathematical argument, not a list of numbers.

Common gap between level 5-6 and 7-8: students at 5-6 often state the correct rule but never justify why it's true structurally — they just say "I noticed the pattern." A 7-8 response instead explains the rule using the actual mechanism of the pattern, for example linking a quadratic rule to a growing square arrangement of dots, and then verifies it against a case well beyond the given data (e.g. n = 20, not n = 6).

How to study & improve your mark

How do I generalise a pattern into an algebraic rule?

Start with the differences between consecutive terms. A constant first difference means a linear rule (an + b); a constant second difference means quadratic (an² + bn + c). Use two or three known terms to solve for the constants, then verify against a term you haven't used yet.

Worked example: Sequence: 3, 8, 15, 24, 35...

  1. First differences: 5, 7, 9, 11 — not constant.
  2. Second differences: 2, 2, 2 — constant, so it's quadratic: rule is .
  3. Second difference = 2a, so a = 1.
  4. Substitute n=1: . Substitute n=2: .
  5. Solving simultaneously: b = 2, c = 0. Rule: .
  6. Check n=5: ✓ matches the given term.

That last step — checking against a term you didn't use to build the rule — is exactly what a Criterion B marker is looking for.

What common mistakes cost marks on investigating patterns tasks?

The most common mistake is jumping straight to a formula without showing the reasoning — markers can't award justification marks for work they can't see. Other frequent losses: not testing the rule on an unseen case, and describing the pattern only in words with no algebraic generalisation at all.

Common mistake checklist — check before you submit:

  • Did you show at least 4 worked cases, not just 2-3?
  • Did you state the rule in words and algebra?
  • Did you test the rule on a value you didn't use to derive it?
  • Did you explain why the rule works, not just that it does?
  • Did you use correct mathematical notation (e.g. or ) rather than vague labels like "answer"?

In my experience marking these, roughly half the level-5 scripts I see have the correct rule but skip the justification step entirely — that's a one-line fix that can lift a script a full level.

How much time should I spend planning before writing up my investigation?

Spend roughly a third of your total time exploring cases and testing ideas on rough paper before you write the formal response. Rushing straight into a write-up usually means backtracking later when a rule turns out wrong, which costs more time than planning would have.

A practical split for a task with a one-week window: 2 days generating and testing cases informally, 1 day drafting the formal write-up with full justification, 1 day checking your rule against multiple values and tightening your explanation of why it holds.

Assessment & how it's graded

Is investigating patterns the same as Criterion D (applying mathematics in real-life contexts)?

No — they're different criteria. Criterion B focuses on spotting and generalising abstract or numerical patterns, while Criterion D asks students to apply mathematics to a genuine real-world context and evaluate the reasonableness of their model. A single task can sometimes touch both, but they're marked separately.

How many investigating patterns tasks will my child do in MYP 4-5?

There's no fixed IB-mandated number — each school's maths department designs its own Criterion B tasks across the year, typically two to four per year in MYP 4-5, alongside tasks covering the other three criteria. Ask your child's teacher for the school's specific assessment calendar.

What's the difference between MYP Criterion B and the DP internal assessment on patterns?

MYP Criterion B tasks are shorter, teacher-set investigations focused specifically on generalising a pattern. The DP Mathematics AA/AI internal assessment (the exploration) is a longer, student-chosen investigation worth 20% of the final grade and doesn't have to involve patterns at all — it's a much broader piece of independent work.

Support, resources & next steps

What resources help most for practising investigating patterns tasks?

Practising with genuine number and shape sequences — not just textbook drills — builds the pattern-recognition instinct examiners reward. On RevisionPrep, Topical Worksheets for MYP Mathematics include sequence-generalisation practice with mark-scheme-style feedback so you can see exactly where a response would gain or lose Criterion B marks.

Can my child get extra help outside school for Criterion B tasks?

Yes — self-study resources like Revision Notes and Topical Worksheets let students practise generalising patterns independently between school-set tasks, which is usually more useful than generic textbook repetition since it targets the exact skill Criterion B assesses: describing and justifying a rule.

Quick tip for parents: ask your child to show you the justification step of a recent task, not just the final answer — if they can explain in plain English why their rule works, they've understood the skill Criterion B is actually testing.

MYP Criterion B vs Criterion D vs DP Exploration

FeatureMYP Criterion BMYP Criterion DDP Maths Exploration
FocusGeneralising patternsReal-life applicationIndependent investigation
Marked out of8820% of final grade
LengthShort taskShort task6-12 pages
Topic choiceTeacher-setTeacher-setStudent-chosen

For more worked pattern-generalisation practice and mark-scheme-style feedback, explore the MYP Mathematics Topical Worksheets and Revision Notes on RevisionPrep.

Related reading